Intel Arc A750 vs. Intel Arc 770: What’s Best for Gaming?

Choosing the right GPU for your gaming setup is crucial for an enjoyable gaming experience. Intel, a newcomer to the discrete GPU market, has launched two mid-range GPUs, the Intel Arc A750 and A770.

In this article, we’ll dive into the differences between the two and help you decide which is better for your needs.

Intel Arc A750 and A770: A Quick Overview of Specifications

Both GPUs are part of Intel’s Alchemist (Arc 7) generation and are built on a 6nm process. The A770 outperforms the A750 with a higher base clock speed, more shading units, execution units, tensor cores, and ray tracing cores. However, the most significant advantage is the A770’s doubled VRAM capacity, which allows it to render games at higher resolutions more effectively.

SpecificationsIntel Arc A750Intel Arc A770
GenerationIntel Alchemist (Arc 7)Intel Alchemist (Arc 7)
Process Size6nm6nm
Base Clock Speed2,050MHz2,100MHz
Boost Clock Speed2,400MHz2,400MHz
Memory Size8GB16GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bus256-bit256-bit
Memory Bandwidth512GB/s512GB/s
Shading Units3,5844,096
Execution Units448512
Tensor Cores448512
Ray Tracing Cores2832
L2 Cache16MB16MB

The A770 is superior to the A750, even if it only provides a minor benefit. It features a slightly faster clock speed and additional shader, ray tracing, and tensor cores. Nonetheless, the former has a substantial advantage over the latter because to its 16GB GDDR6 Memory. The A770 GPU can render games more efficiently at higher resolutions because to its doubled VRAM


More GDDR RAM can assist your PC’s render quality, much like more DDR Memory can help a computer’s performance. However, they differ somewhat; this is the distinction between GDDR and DDR Memory.

Intel Arc

Performance Analysis: Intel Arc A750 vs. A770

When examining the theoretical performance, the A770 performs around 14% better than the A750. But real-world gaming performance shows that the A770 is only about 6% more powerful than the A750, providing slightly higher FPS in various game titles at 1080p and 1440p resolutions.

Intel Arc A750Intel Arc A770
Pixel Rate268.8 GPixel/s307.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate537.6 GTexel/s614.4 GTexel/s
FP16 (half)34.41 TFLOPs39.32 TFLOPs
FP32 (float)17.20 TFLOPs19.66 TFLOPs

Power Consumption, Size, and Ports

Both the A750 and A770 have a dual-slot design and a 225W TDP, meaning that you won’t need a power supply or case upgrade if you’re building a recent CPU setup. They also feature the same ports, including one HDMI 2.1 port and three DisplayPort 2.0 ports.

Intel Arc A750 vs. Intel Arc A770: FPS Numbers

As the A750 and A770 are both mid-range video cards, we don’t expect them to blow away our minds with high frame rates on 4K resolution and ray tracing turned on. Nevertheless, let’s check out how these cards perform across different games and settings at 1080 and 1440p, as tested by TechSpot.

Game TitleSettingsIntel Arc A770Intel Arc A750
Rainbow Six ExtractionVery High Quality, 1080p174159
Very High Quality, 1440p117108
F1 2021Ultra High Quality, RT Medium, 1080p10694
Ultra High Quality, RT Medium, 1440p7670
Horizon Zero DawnUltimate Quality, 1080p9285
Ultimate Quality, 1440p7670
Watch Dogs: LegionVery High Quality, 1080p9894
Very High Quality, 1440p7670
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderHighest Quality, 1080p9286
Highest Quality, 1440p7166
Hitman 3Ultra Quality, 1080p108103
Ultra Quality, 1440p8177
Far Cry 6High Quality, 1080p117108
High Quality, 1440p9386
Cyberpunk 2077High Quality, 1080p6866
High Quality, 1440p5855
Dying Light 2 Stay HumanHigh Quality, 1080p8581
High Quality, 1440p6459
Halo InfiniteHigh Quality, 1080p5958
High Quality, 1440p4947
Spider-Man RemasteredHigh Quality, 1080p132128
High Quality, 1440p10499
Counter-Strike: Global OffensiveMedium Quality, 1080p147147
Medium Quality, 1440p145145

Given these numbers:

  • The A770 averages 106.5 FPS at 1080p and 84.17 FPS at 1440p.
  • The A750 only clocks an average of 100.75 FPS at 1080p and 79.33 FPS at 1440p.

So, although the A770 has a 14% theoretical advantage over the A750, it’s only 6% more powerful than the A750 when gaming.

Price Considerations: Intel Arc A750 vs. A770

At launch, the Intel Arc A770 was priced at $329, while the A750 was priced at $289. Due to the A770’s slightly better performance, it commands a higher price. However, it’s essential to consider the price-to-performance ratio and availability when making your decision.


  • What are the main differences between the Intel Arc A750 and A770?

The primary differences between the A750 and A770 are the base clock speed, shading units, execution units, tensor cores, ray tracing cores, and VRAM capacity. The A770 has better specifications and performs slightly better in gaming, but it also comes at a higher price.

  • Which GPU is better for gaming, the Intel Arc A750 or A770?

The Intel Arc A770 is better for gaming due to its higher performance, but the A750 offers a more affordable option with a slightly lower performance. The choice depends on your budget and gaming preferences.

  • Are there any driver issues with Intel Arc GPUs?

The Intel Arc GPUs are new to the market so they may have some driver issues with older games. However, Intel continuously optimises its drivers, and these issues should be resolved over time.

  • Should I choose the Intel Arc A750 or A770 for my gaming setup?

The choice between the Intel Arc A750 and A770 depends on your budget, gaming preferences, and willingness to try a new product. The A770 offers slightly better performance but comes at a higher price, while the A750 is a more budget-friendly option with slightly lower performance.


With its mid-range Intel Arc A750 and A770 graphics cards, Intel has entered the discrete GPU market. Both GPUs belong to the Intel Alchemist (Arc 7) generation. The A770 offers a slight performance advantage over the A750, featuring a higher base clock speed, more shading units, execution units, tensor cores, and ray tracing cores. The A770 also has double the memory size (16GB) compared to the A750 (8GB).

Theoretical performance shows the A770 to be around 14% better than the A750. However, real-world gaming performance demonstrates a smaller 6% difference in average frame rates between the two GPUs across various game titles and settings. Both cards have the same ports, dual-slot design, and 225W TDP, requiring a minimum 550-watt PSU for the entire system.

Leave a Comment