Choosing the right GPU for your gaming setup is crucial for an enjoyable gaming experience. Intel, a newcomer to the discrete GPU market, has launched two mid-range GPUs, the Intel Arc A750 and A770.
In this article, we’ll dive into the differences between the two and help you decide which is better for your needs.
Intel Arc A750 and A770: A Quick Overview of Specifications
Both GPUs are part of Intel’s Alchemist (Arc 7) generation and are built on a 6nm process. The A770 outperforms the A750 with a higher base clock speed, more shading units, execution units, tensor cores, and ray tracing cores. However, the most significant advantage is the A770’s doubled VRAM capacity, which allows it to render games at higher resolutions more effectively.
|Specifications||Intel Arc A750||Intel Arc A770|
|Generation||Intel Alchemist (Arc 7)||Intel Alchemist (Arc 7)|
|Base Clock Speed||2,050MHz||2,100MHz|
|Boost Clock Speed||2,400MHz||2,400MHz|
|Ray Tracing Cores||28||32|
The A770 is superior to the A750, even if it only provides a minor benefit. It features a slightly faster clock speed and additional shader, ray tracing, and tensor cores. Nonetheless, the former has a substantial advantage over the latter because to its 16GB GDDR6 Memory. The A770 GPU can render games more efficiently at higher resolutions because to its doubled VRAM
More GDDR RAM can assist your PC’s render quality, much like more DDR Memory can help a computer’s performance. However, they differ somewhat; this is the distinction between GDDR and DDR Memory.
Performance Analysis: Intel Arc A750 vs. A770
When examining the theoretical performance, the A770 performs around 14% better than the A750. But real-world gaming performance shows that the A770 is only about 6% more powerful than the A750, providing slightly higher FPS in various game titles at 1080p and 1440p resolutions.
|Intel Arc A750||Intel Arc A770|
|Pixel Rate||268.8 GPixel/s||307.2 GPixel/s|
|Texture Rate||537.6 GTexel/s||614.4 GTexel/s|
|FP16 (half)||34.41 TFLOPs||39.32 TFLOPs|
|FP32 (float)||17.20 TFLOPs||19.66 TFLOPs|
Power Consumption, Size, and Ports
Both the A750 and A770 have a dual-slot design and a 225W TDP, meaning that you won’t need a power supply or case upgrade if you’re building a recent CPU setup. They also feature the same ports, including one HDMI 2.1 port and three DisplayPort 2.0 ports.
Intel Arc A750 vs. Intel Arc A770: FPS Numbers
As the A750 and A770 are both mid-range video cards, we don’t expect them to blow away our minds with high frame rates on 4K resolution and ray tracing turned on. Nevertheless, let’s check out how these cards perform across different games and settings at 1080 and 1440p, as tested by TechSpot.
|Game Title||Settings||Intel Arc A770||Intel Arc A750|
|Rainbow Six Extraction||Very High Quality, 1080p||174||159|
|Very High Quality, 1440p||117||108|
|F1 2021||Ultra High Quality, RT Medium, 1080p||106||94|
|Ultra High Quality, RT Medium, 1440p||76||70|
|Horizon Zero Dawn||Ultimate Quality, 1080p||92||85|
|Ultimate Quality, 1440p||76||70|
|Watch Dogs: Legion||Very High Quality, 1080p||98||94|
|Very High Quality, 1440p||76||70|
|Shadow of the Tomb Raider||Highest Quality, 1080p||92||86|
|Highest Quality, 1440p||71||66|
|Hitman 3||Ultra Quality, 1080p||108||103|
|Ultra Quality, 1440p||81||77|
|Far Cry 6||High Quality, 1080p||117||108|
|High Quality, 1440p||93||86|
|Cyberpunk 2077||High Quality, 1080p||68||66|
|High Quality, 1440p||58||55|
|Dying Light 2 Stay Human||High Quality, 1080p||85||81|
|High Quality, 1440p||64||59|
|Halo Infinite||High Quality, 1080p||59||58|
|High Quality, 1440p||49||47|
|Spider-Man Remastered||High Quality, 1080p||132||128|
|High Quality, 1440p||104||99|
|Counter-Strike: Global Offensive||Medium Quality, 1080p||147||147|
|Medium Quality, 1440p||145||145|
Given these numbers:
- The A770 averages 106.5 FPS at 1080p and 84.17 FPS at 1440p.
- The A750 only clocks an average of 100.75 FPS at 1080p and 79.33 FPS at 1440p.
So, although the A770 has a 14% theoretical advantage over the A750, it’s only 6% more powerful than the A750 when gaming.
Price Considerations: Intel Arc A750 vs. A770
At launch, the Intel Arc A770 was priced at $329, while the A750 was priced at $289. Due to the A770’s slightly better performance, it commands a higher price. However, it’s essential to consider the price-to-performance ratio and availability when making your decision.
- What are the main differences between the Intel Arc A750 and A770?
The primary differences between the A750 and A770 are the base clock speed, shading units, execution units, tensor cores, ray tracing cores, and VRAM capacity. The A770 has better specifications and performs slightly better in gaming, but it also comes at a higher price.
- Which GPU is better for gaming, the Intel Arc A750 or A770?
The Intel Arc A770 is better for gaming due to its higher performance, but the A750 offers a more affordable option with a slightly lower performance. The choice depends on your budget and gaming preferences.
- Are there any driver issues with Intel Arc GPUs?
The Intel Arc GPUs are new to the market so they may have some driver issues with older games. However, Intel continuously optimises its drivers, and these issues should be resolved over time.
- Should I choose the Intel Arc A750 or A770 for my gaming setup?
The choice between the Intel Arc A750 and A770 depends on your budget, gaming preferences, and willingness to try a new product. The A770 offers slightly better performance but comes at a higher price, while the A750 is a more budget-friendly option with slightly lower performance.
With its mid-range Intel Arc A750 and A770 graphics cards, Intel has entered the discrete GPU market. Both GPUs belong to the Intel Alchemist (Arc 7) generation. The A770 offers a slight performance advantage over the A750, featuring a higher base clock speed, more shading units, execution units, tensor cores, and ray tracing cores. The A770 also has double the memory size (16GB) compared to the A750 (8GB).
Theoretical performance shows the A770 to be around 14% better than the A750. However, real-world gaming performance demonstrates a smaller 6% difference in average frame rates between the two GPUs across various game titles and settings. Both cards have the same ports, dual-slot design, and 225W TDP, requiring a minimum 550-watt PSU for the entire system.